Is Trump a Life Challenge?

M

Mary Stetler

Well-known member
I am very much against presidents or congress giving away our national lands and parks to development. Whether to the lumber companies or mining interests. National lands belong to the people in my opinion, not the government or presidents. They were set aside for the nation. We don't lease them out for a decent gain for the country's coffers. We get the shaft in most contracts.

But, then again, people are still deranged over Trump and things they don't understand and won't research.
 
Good afternoon to all-

Yes. the First Felon IS a life challenge.

He has no notion of the value of wild, undeveloped lands which benefit us all. Instead, he sees any
"undeveloped" land as a waste of money-making opportunity- whether for mining. logging or golf course construction...

And to be accurate, the "derangement" so rampant right now comes mostly from the First Felon's words and actions- not the people who point out the damage he and his supporters are doing.

you all be safe and keep well- and confusion to the republicans
Ed.
 
National parks and National public lands is a Progressive idea first actualized by (I think) Theodore Roosevelt. Not everything the Progressives advocate is bad, although most is. Under the Constitution, the public lands belong to the states local governments, not the Federal government. Although the idea of the Federal government owning land for specific purposes is perhaps allowable, vast tracts under the management of the BLM within state borders is clearly not Constitutional. The water were muddied by the fact that much of U.S. land was not organized into states for many decades. Although some/many of the deficiencies left by the Constitutional Convention were addressed a few years later by the Northwest Ordinance, the ninth and tenth amendments have been largely ignored by the Progressives and undereducated in recent times.

If he is reducing the amount of land included within monuments, it is totally within the powers of the President, but can be overridden by Congress should they choose to do so.
 
Ed Delabama said:
Good afternoon to all-

Yes. the First Felon IS a life challenge.

He has no notion of the value of wild, undeveloped lands which benefit us all. Instead, he sees any
"undeveloped" land as a waste of money-making opportunity- whether for mining. logging or golf course construction...

And to be accurate, the "derangement" so rampant right now comes mostly from the First Felon's words and actions- not the people who point out the damage he and his supporters are doing.

you all be safe and keep well- and confusion to the republicans
Ed.
Click to expand...
Now, now, @Ed Delabama , you promised to avoid politics. A gentleman always keeps his promises. 🤨
 
Mary Stetler said:
National lands belong to the people in my opinion, not the government or presidents. They were set aside for the nation.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, much of the land the government owns is treated as private resorts for the elite and the politically connected, while the general public is prohibited. The same is true of land that has been put in the hands of various land conservation groups, often at the public's expense.
 
Honestly, I'm tired of Trump and not sure I want 2 more years. Sadly the Democrats are bat-shit crazy and getting worse by the minute, so Trump is the best solution at this time.

I'm sick and tired of everything in the USA being about Trump, like him parading around at the awards ceremony of the World Cup like he had anything to do with it. What a pompous ass and embarrassment to the country. That ego is just irritating. And don't get me started on renaming every damn landmark in the country to "Trump Whatever." Seriously?? I was thrilled when they stripped his name off the Kennedy Center. Some things are best left alone.

So I'm not sure what I think of the National Parks thing. I'll have to read more about that to see if I'm mad or not.
 
Good afternoon to all-

I wondered how long I could post here before I offended someone. Not long it seems. I posted an honest opinion in reply to a question asked here- but I suppose that sort of thing is not acceptable here.

I'm sorry that the thin-skinned persons here find my honest posts to be BS and that I am not a "gentleman" for posting things the way I see them. I am weary of people who are so insecure in their own beliefs and thinking that anyone who says anything which does not follow along with their opinions is "BS and not a gentleman".

And I'll stand by every point that I made- whether you folks agree or not- doesn't really matter to me at all.

you all be safe and keep well- and confusion to the republicans
Ed
 
Ed Delabama said:
Good afternoon to all-

Yes. the First Felon IS a life challenge.

He has no notion of the value of wild, undeveloped lands which benefit us all. Instead, he sees any
"undeveloped" land as a waste of money-making opportunity- whether for mining. logging or golf course construction...

And to be accurate, the "derangement" so rampant right now comes mostly from the First Felon's words and actions- not the people who point out the damage he and his supporters are doing.

you all be safe and keep well- and confusion to the republicans
Ed.
Click to expand...
Ed, what happened to no politics?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top