My Bible study

All these opinions and suggestions are great , and it is always worthwhile looking into and reading different ways of thought on Christian religion . But let's always remember there are a few core truths that are in all of them .......believe in the Father , the Son and the Holy Spirit , except Jesus as our Savior and be the best you can both for yourself and your fellow man . Everything else is only there to lead you to these core truths which leads to your salvation.
 
I am a believer that we as a society tend to make things more difficult than they have to be . Finding meanings for words in the Bible or saying this religion is the true religion or just disagreeing to things that let's face it , most times disagreeing to things we don't fully understand anyway . Why must we always have to be stubborn, why not take the core beliefs that I just wrote in my previous post and enjoy one another .
 
I am a believer that we as a society tend to make things more difficult than they have to be . Finding meanings for words in the Bible or saying this religion is the true religion or just disagreeing to things that let's face it , most times disagreeing to things we don't fully understand anyway . Why must we always have to be stubborn, why not take the core beliefs that I just wrote in my previous post and enjoy one another .
Jesus said his yoke is light.
 
During my bible readings I usually will stop and meditate but not this time. I had a conversation about Adam and Eve. Has anyone every thought that Adam and Eve were not the only people God created?
I'm not familiar with anything in Genesis that might have inferred that. I do know that God makes reference to "We," as though He was not alone for Creation. I forget what the explanation is for the use of "We."

Have you read something that sparked this thought, Von, or is is a "just wondering"? And good for you for slugging though Genesis. If I had a nickel for every begat...
 
Last edited:
I'm not familiar with anything in Genesis that might have inferred that. I do know that God makes reference to "We," as though He was not alone for Creation. I forget what the explanation is for the use of "We."

Have you read something that sparked this thought, Von, or is is a "just wondering"? And good for you for slugging though Genesis. If I had a nickel for every begat...

John B., I hope you remember that I am like a detective. So I detected yes. Since Adam and Eve were only mentioned how could their son Cain find a wife, huh? So that made me think that God just didn't create Adam and Eve.
 
John B., I hope you remember that I am like a detective. So I detected yes. Since Adam and Eve were only mentioned how could their son Cain find a wife, huh? So that made me think that God just didn't create Adam and Eve.
The theory as I just now read it is that "...Cain’s wife would most logically be one of his sisters or a close female relative from among Adam and Eve’s progeny. In the earliest generations, such marriage was necessary to fulfill humanity’s command to “be fruitful and multiply.” The theory continues that at such an early point in Earth's history, such intermarriage was the only way for the human race to expand. There are further theories that it wasn't wasn't until much later that "as mutations in the gene pool accrued," it became necessary for God to command that marrying close relatives be avoided (Leviticus 18-20). The laws handed down in Leviticus were written after Exodus from Egypt and during the wandering in the desert. My Quest Bible puts the date Leviticus was written at 1440BC.

Apparently, this topic has come up before. It never really occurred to me. I find it interesting that what we know to be necessary variation in the genes of parents is referred to as "impurities in the gene pool" that did not exist early on. As an aside (and to provide a frame of reference to the state of generations from that point forward), I read some time ago that there is enough genetic variation between first cousins that the risk of their offspring having birth defects is roughly the same as a woman giving birth at age 40. If I recall correctly, the risk is under 5%, perhaps as low as 3%. It struck me as being much lower than I would have expected.
 
The theory as I just now read it is that "...Cain’s wife would most logically be one of his sisters or a close female relative from among Adam and Eve’s progeny. In the earliest generations, such marriage was necessary to fulfill humanity’s command to “be fruitful and multiply.” The theory continues that at such an early point in Earth's history, such intermarriage was the only way for the human race to expand. There are further theories that it wasn't wasn't until much later that "as mutations in the gene pool accrued," it became necessary for God to command that marrying close relatives be avoided (Leviticus 18-20). The laws handed down in Leviticus were written after Exodus from Egypt and during the wandering in the desert. My Quest Bible puts the date Leviticus was written at 1440BC.

Apparently, this topic has come up before. It never really occurred to me. I find it interesting that what we know to be necessary variation in the genes of parents is referred to as "impurities in the gene pool" that did not exist early on. As an aside (and to provide a frame of reference to the state of generations from that point forward), I read some time ago that there is enough genetic variation between first cousins that the risk of their offspring having birth defects is roughly the same as a woman giving birth at age 40. If I recall correctly, the risk is under 5%, perhaps as low as 3%. It struck me as being much lower than I would have expected.
I did initially have that first thought about a sister as his wife.
 
I did initially have that first thought about a sister as his wife.
The article I read pointed out that because people back then lived for many hundreds of years but generations were still only 15-20 years apart, it might have been a female relative who was not necessarily a sibling. There was also some explanation that genetic "corruptions" compound over time, meaning that it makes scientific sense for that law in Leviticus to have eventually been necessary. I'd imagine that wandering through the desert for 40 years meant that there were a couple of generations created within those tribes, so it was time to diversify the pool.

Link to Bible Hub article
 
The article I read pointed out that because people back then lived for many hundreds of years but generations were still only 15-20 years apart, it might have been a female relative who was not necessarily a sibling. There was also some explanation that genetic "corruptions" compound over time, meaning that it makes scientific sense for that law in Leviticus to have eventually been necessary. I'd imagine that wandering through the desert for 40 years meant that there were a couple of generations created within those tribes, so it was time to diversify the pool.

Link to Bible Hub article
That makes sense. That's what I find myself studying or questioning and I always forget about how long they lived.
 
That makes sense. That's what I find myself studying or questioning and I always forget about how long they lived.
This is why I've occasionally sought out (but not found) a Bible Study group not attached to a regular church. Everyone's perspectives and questions deepen our mutual understanding...and it's interactive, unlike sitting through a sermon.
 
I always skip over the begats. ☺️ I think of the Old Testament as sort of being an oral history of the Jewish people, not a history of actual events. There was no writing in the beginning.
 
Back
Top