Hate Trump - Love Trump - Don't Hate Trump

John Walker said:
That depends on what you mean by "great again", whether you mean by making the billionaires richer at the expense
of everyone else who pays for food, utilities, taxes and insurance etc in this country, which is what's been happening recently,
or whether you mean for the rich to provide their fair share, and for the government to thus allow for prosperity for all of the citizens.
Click to expand...
Great agenda
 
John Walker said:
That depends on what you mean by "great again", whether you mean by making the billionaires richer at the expense
of everyone else who pays for food, utilities, taxes and insurance etc in this country, which is what's been happening recently,
or whether you mean for the rich to provide their fair share, and for the government to thus allow for prosperity for all of the citizens.
Click to expand...
Prosperity is available for everyone, its called having a job, and not living above your means. Sitting on your butt ( not pointing finger at anyone here) at home and expecting everyone else to pay your way, is not the responsibility of those who have money that they worked for. If someone worked 50+ years to have what they have they shouldn't have to give to to people who didn't. That doesn't include handicapped people, they are entitled to help from their families and others.
 
I agree with some of what President Trump does, and I disagree with others, but in either case, I have to be aware that I don't have all the facts. I doubt that anyone here does. I disagreed with way more of what was going on during President Biden's administration, but I don't think he knew what went on under his name. He didn't know what was going on beyond deciding which flavor of ice cream he wanted. Whoever was truly in charge during that time did a great deal of harm to the country, and I hope we never again elect a vegetable to the highest levels of office in our country. I haven't seen anything to suggest that Joe Biden would have done a good job in his younger years, but he had little or nothing to do with his presidency.

I don't buy into the idea that Donald Trump ran for office solely to save the country. He is an exceedingly egotistical man, so it makes sense that he'd be interested in being elevated to the level of president. Then again, you would have to have a large ego to run for president, wouldn't you? I don't think that it necessarily follows that his ego would prevent him from being a good president. He wants to be known as a president who accomplished important things, and this can be good, assuming that we all want important things to be accomplished.

I am sure that he has made some mistakes in his own right, but I think that his biggest problems have come from accepting bad advice from people who might have agendas contrary to his own. That makes sense because, though he's a smart guy, he came into office in his first term as an outsider without political or governmental expertise, so of course, he turned to others whom he may have viewed as being more knowledgeable about one thing or another. A lot of these people steered him wrong. This is his responsibility, but the fault is not entirely his.

I agree that he means well, and that whoever was actually in charge between 2020 and 2024 did not mean well.
 
Greg Karakas said:
I agree with some of what President Trump does, and I disagree with others, but in either case, I have to be aware that I don't have all the facts. I doubt that anyone here does. I disagreed with way more of what was going on during President Biden's administration, but I don't think he knew what went on under his name. He didn't know what was going on beyond deciding which flavor of ice cream he wanted. Whoever was truly in charge during that time did a great deal of harm to the country, and I hope we never again elect a vegetable to the highest levels of office in our country. I haven't seen anything to suggest that Joe Biden would have done a good job in his younger years, but he had little or nothing to do with his presidency.

I don't buy into the idea that Donald Trump ran for office to save the country. He is an exceedingly egotistical man, so it makes sense that he'd be interested in being elevated to the level of president. Then again, you would have to have a large ego to run for president, wouldn't you? I don't think that it necessarily follows that his ego would prevent him from being a good president. He wants to be known as a president who accomplished important things, and this can be good, assuming that we all want important things to be accomplished.

I am sure that he has made some mistakes in his own right, but I think that his biggest problems have come from accepting bad advice from people who might have agendas contrary to his own. That makes sense because, though he's a smart guy, he came into office in his first term as an outsider without political or governmental expertise, so of course, he turned to others whom he may have viewed as being more knowledgeable about one thing or another. A lot of these people steered him wrong. This is his responsibility, but the fault is not entirely his.

I agree that he means well, and that whoever was actually in charge between 2020 and 2024 did not mean well.
Click to expand...
Long ago, Trump was being interviewed by Oprah Winfrey. They were both big tv personalities. She asked him if he would ever consider running for president and he said NO. But then he back tracked and said the only reason he would run was if he saw the country definitely needed him to do it. (not a direct quote).
He had no need for the headaches or stress of being president. He definitely saw that we were heading in the wrong direction. He knew how things happened in the world and in the US. His disruption of the plan of those that were working on controlling the world is why everyone is fighting him in every way possible.
A very long video explaining some things he saw:
 
If you were the mother, or father, the aunt, or a close friend, of a person merely doing their job, would you step in their defense from being publicly humiliated by anyone, including the POTUS?
Which would you choose ? No, If's and or but's. What and who would hold more importance?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top