Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Conspiracies & Paranormal' started by Joe Riley, Jan 27, 2017.
Hey @Joe Riley , This was one of the big conundrums Michael had. (Another was the JFK shooting.)
Michael started picking apart all the different things that caught his attention just after they began airing footage. His first question was, "How is that flag waving in 'what' wind? After that he search and found so many things that made him question our space program.
He wished he could be sure that we actually did as claimed, but he never got any answers to his doubts.
There is a place near Flagstaff, Arizona, called Cinder Lake. Apparently, back in the mid-60's, NASA dropped bombs there to make craters and have a simulated Sea of Tranquility so the astronauts could train for the moon.
However, when you look at the pictures that were supposedly actually taken on the moon and compare it to the landscape in Arizona, the background between the two is very close.
Coincidence ........ possibly; but an interesting comparison, in any case.
...The way in which i see it is...if they had REALLY landed on the moon back in `69...they would have followed it up with further landings...most likely within five years from the so called first one. It would have been the natural thing to do, after all. People have argued at different times, that the costs involved were just too insurmountable, but, i am unable to buy that. How much to the national budget at the time did it cost to maintain the conflict in Vietnam...?
Between 1969 and 1972, there were 6 "moon landings". (Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 & 17) I believe they were all faked.
What was it again which Abraham Lincoln said about fooling the people...? I rest my case...!! I wonder how they`ll go about faking all the Mars landings...?!!
Here is one of the supposed pictures of the astronauts on the moon. In the background you can see Earth. When you zoom in on the part of this picture where the earth is at, you can see that it has been photoshopped in, and there is a square around the part where the earth shows.
It is still black, and you can't see it unless you zoom in on that part of the photo, but then you can see a distinct square where the earth was put into the composite of this picture.
Another thing wrong is the size of earth from the moon. We see the moon about this size at night, but since earth is a LOT larger than the moon, it should be HUGE in the background, and not the small size they are showing it.
I think about the seer number of people who would have to be in on
a conspiracy to deceive the world on just one moon landing, let alone
Number would have to be in the many thousands.
No real proof of a cover up; no one speaking out about their part
How would you go about faking 6 moon landings?
This was just a movie, something Hollywood thought up...
The space suits had no protection against radiation. If the first flight was impossible, the remaining 5 flights would have been impossible. Only the astronauts and flight controllers who manipulated the pictures and signals, along with stage crew would be involved. The majority of technicians would be fooled along with the TV viewers. We lived in a trusting world where people did not question.
...In the space of just THREE years....SIX supposed moon landings....? Not even the most creative minds in Hollywood could give any credence to THAT flagrant piece of scandal...!!
You are Probably all looking at fake photos and videos. Even the Russians have gone to the moon!
All the pictures youre analyzing and taking apart probably are all fakes.
I have no idea why people even want prove it false.
What I find incredible is that all these conspiracy theories are from our lifetimes and you can't believe them but the Bible goes way back and everything in it is taken for truth???
But Noah's Ark I was real?
I'm not bothered one way or the other, they did - they didn't
But - could never fathom the 'radiation' aspect of it. Theres a radiation belt to get through
So I am confused by it - but that's all, just confused. I don't lose sleep thinking of it
I'm sure there's a scientific answer to that...