What has happened to Tucker Carlson?

Don Alaska said:
A twelve minute video about the strange change in Tucker Carlson and has he disappeared?

Click to expand...




I've seen a lot about this lately. I never liked Carlson so I haven't paid much attention to him. I have seen similar comments about Candace Owens going off the rails as well.

There are several videos on Youtube from Victor Davis Hanson about Carlson, including interviews, but they are all quite lengthy.
 
It has really gone from bad to almost unbelievable with Tucker Carlson. What they are saying now, if actually true, could end him in prison, or faced with charges for treason.
Or. Maybe it is all a set up ?

In any case, apparently , President Trump had Tucker in the Oval Office several times before the strike on Iran that started everything. President Trump might have told Tucker that he had no intentions of attacking Iran, and Tucker passed the information that he was getting from the president on to the Iranian leaders.
This ended up with Khomieni and his whole group being at the meeting where they were all killed.

Our government had the Iranian leaders phones tapped, and maybe Tucker Carlson’s phone as well, or they just picked up his conversations from their intel on the Iranians.
In any case, it appears that Tucker was passing along what should have been classified information to the Iranians. President Trump may or may not have known that Tucker would do that.
He might have used Tucker to send wrong information to Iran leaders, or it might just be that Tucker was passing along what Trump told him, and things changed and we made the attack because Iran was all set to bomb our bases, like President Trump said.

It is hard to tell what is really going on. At this point, it looks like Tucker could face charges and possibly end up in prison. On the other hand, this might be a deep coverup, and Trump sent Tucker to tell the Iranian leaders the wrong news ? It is too hard to tell what is real and what is part of a plan.

Tucker Carlson has done some really good interviews, and seemed like a real patriot, so it is hard for me to think that he has suddenly turned on America.
 
Last edited:
I am skeptical. There has been an organized agenda to torpedo Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and any other influential voices against Trump's foreign excursions, including those who are not fully on board. When a juicy scandal comes up in such cases, my skepticism arises.
 
I suspect we're being gaslighted. I don't know the facts behind the Tucker Carlson thing but am having trouble believing he is working for the Iranians against the United States. I have no doubt that he was against our recent involvement in Iran, but he hasn't changed his positions there; it could be argued that Trump did.

We're being told that everyone who disagrees with Trump on anything is a RINO, and that's nonsense too. Marjorie Taylor Greene is righteously angry with Trump, and I would be too, if I were her. She was treated very unfairly by Trump. She didn't change her opinions; Trump changed his policies. The same is true of Rand Paul. He can, and always could be a PITA, and has never been a strong Trump supporter, but he hasn't changed his opinions in that respect, yet he's being portrayed as a RINO because he doesn't think we should be involved in military excursions against countries that didn't attack us first. I disagree with him often, but he's not a RINO. Rather, many of the people who are now ardent supporters of Trump are RINOs who would turn on him at the drop of a hat. But, because they are supporting his military excursions, Trump considers them to be MAGA, or true Republicans, while anyone who disagrees with anything he does is relegated to the status of a RINO. I would have no trouble believing that the Iranian attack on our base in Benghazi was a false flag either perpetuated by the United States or Israel.

That said, I don't entirely disagree with much of what he's doing, although I remain skeptical of the eventual outcomes in Iran. I hope things turn out well for us there, but I don't think the Trump Administration has been entirely above-board, and can certainly understand why someone would disagree with it. I'm not so sure we should have gotten involved but since we did, I hope we win.
 
Last edited:
Ken Anderson said:
We're being told that everyone who disagrees with Trump on anything is a RINO, and that's nonsense too.
Click to expand...

This is one thing that really bothers me. I want politicians who can think for themselves and aren't simply pawns in the game of Congress. I have admired John Cornyn for many years because he is a free thinker and has never "toed the line" with Trump. (Though that very trait can also be annoying.) I don't believe Cornyn is a RINO at all; just a man with a few uncompromised principles.

It does annoy me when Republicans don't support the things I feel are important, but I can appreciate a person who thinks for themselves and isn't bought or badgered. The democrats are a solid voting block with the possible exception of Fetterman, who has revealed himself a man of integrity. It's difficult to recognize integrity these days because it is a rare commodity.

I don't know if democrats are threatened or bought, but they certainly stick together to push the party agenda.
 
When it comes to advancing imprortant items of the Republican agenda, I would like Republicans to vote like Republicans, but they should be free to promote alternate agendas and to vote their conscience on things of immense importance to them. When things like fair election policies are waylaid by someone who seems interested only in getting his or her time in front of the microphone, that can be very annoying, and indeed, might be grounds for primarying them in a subsequent election, but I am not pleased when Trump endorses true RINOs who would stab him in the back every chance they get, while denouncing those who have been on board with nearly all of his agenda but thought he might have meant it when he talked about ending the endless wars.
 
Joe Kent was reportedly leaking information at the highest level, was separated from many aspects of what he should have been doing and was on the brink of being fired. He quit in loud fashion so he could cash in and gain celebrity instead of waiting to be fired. As was outlined in the video, he was not consistent in his views.

Trump wanted to attack Iran, has always wanted to attack Iran and has said so for decades. Israel may have determined the timing however. They saw that Iran was at its weakest point ever, and decided that now was the time to attack. Trump wanted to allow a bit more time for negotiations, but Bibi told him they were going to attack Iran and asked for his help. Knowing that if Israel attacked Iran, U.S. bases, personnel, and that of allies in the Middle East would be major targets, the President decided to go earlier than he wished to better protect our troops and the facilities of our allies in the region. As you can see, Iran directed more of its attacks at the UAE than it did Israel. It would have been much, much worse if he hadn't moved when he did to take out so many missile launchers and facilities.
 
Yeah, I think Trump was left without much choice. I doubt it was in his plans at all, despite idiots claiming he wanted to seize the oil.
 
Don Alaska said:
I don't think seizing the oil was in the plans, but controlling oil flow to China was.
Click to expand...
I think Europe figured in there as well. They have been stubbornly arrogant about trying to keep on sucking the guts out of America and they are extremely reluctant about securing their own petroleum access.

Even worse, they seem to be doubling down on Marxism and normalizing radical Islam within their own borders.

I hope there is some plan to neuter them before they turn into a Soviet-style enemy of the US.

However I take your point. China seems to want to turn Iran into a proxy war with the US in response. People are suggesting that China is providing intelligence to Iran, including targeting information used to attack the carrier fleet.
 
Jacob Petersheim said:
I think Europe figured in there as well. They have been stubbornly arrogant about trying to keep on sucking the guts out of America and they are extremely reluctant about securing their own petroleum access.

Even worse, they seem to be doubling down on Marxism and normalizing radical Islam within their own borders.

I hope there is some plan to neuter them before they turn into a Soviet-style enemy of the US.

However I take your point. China seems to want to turn Iran into a proxy war with the US in response. People are suggesting that China is providing intelligence to Iran, including targeting information used to attack the carrier fleet.
Click to expand...
We have been supplying targeting info for Ukraine against Russia, so it is a goose/gander thing there. The UK PM and the French President rely on the Muslim immigrant vote to keep any semblance of power, so they cannot fight in a war against any facet of Islam, but if the U.S. leaves NATO, they will have to pay for their own defense and they don't want that either. I think the U.S. would be better off replacing both the UN and NATO with different organizations, and Trump appears to be considering that option. The rules post-WWII no longer apply as the situation and the enemies have changed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top