Live virus mRNA vaccines

[Don Alaska]

This was forwarded to me, so I don't know the validity of the data or the opinions. It appears to be documentation of a live test of a new swine flu vaccine. If you remember, swine flu in humans caused a big to-do in human vaccine technology in the 1970s that resulted in the vaccine being removed from the market due to terrible side effects. This supposedly is using a live virus mRNA vaccine, which means the mRNA is contained in a viable, genetically engineered virus that is used as a vaccine. The virus would be continue to be viable in the meat produced, but would probably be denatured when the meat was cooked.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2068333052225339446

 

[John Brunner]

I see the FDA Advisory Panel just unanimously recommended that mRNA technology be approved for annual flu vaccines for ages 50 to 64. The FDA previously declined to approve this because the study was "imperfect." It failed to compare the mRNA vaccine to the standard high-dose vaccine typically given the target age group (meaning that test subjects were given a lower dose vaccine than they would have received in "real world" conditions.) Two of the panel members failed to disclose their Conflicts of Interest, but memory fails, and I cannot find specifics on that right now.

In other news, RFK Jr. cancelled an FDA ad campaign encouraging people to receive an influenza vaccine. The plan was to transform the agency’s messaging to focus on “informed consent,"

 

[John Brunner]

This was forwarded to me, so I don't know the validity of the data or the opinions. It appears to be documentation of a live test of a new swine flu vaccine. If you remember, swine flu in humans caused a big to-do in human vaccine technology in the 1970s that resulted in the vaccine being removed from the market due to terrible side effects. This supposedly is using a live virus mRNA vaccine, which means the mRNA is contained in a viable, genetically engineered virus that is used as a vaccine. The virus would be continue to be viable in the meat produced, but would probably be denatured when the meat was cooked.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2068333052225339446

If they have the live virus, why wrap it in mRNA technology, other than patents and money?

 

[Don Alaska]

If they have the live virus, why wrap it in mRNA technology, other than patents and money?

I really don't know other than to make it potentially transmissible and perhaps more virulent. The data I found said that the virus had to be genetically engineered to accept the mRNA attachment. I wonder if perhaps this may be the end of mankind. Once you begin messing with the genetics of diseases, you are tampering with potential extinction. It would be really terrible if those who are unvaxxed could "catch" the disease from those who were vaccinated. There were hints of that during Covid, but then it was just the insertion of the mRNA into existing somatic cells, but if they can attach it to a virus that is spreadable, the potential for transmission would be many times greater.

 

[John Brunner]

I really don't know other than to make it potentially transmissible and perhaps more virulent. The data I found said that the virus had to be genetically engineered to accept the mRNA attachment. I wonder if perhaps this may be the end of mankind. Once you begin messing with the genetics of diseases, you are tampering with potential extinction. It would be really terrible if those who are unvaxxed could "catch" the disease from those who were vaccinated. There were hints of that during Covid, but then it was just the insertion of the mRNA into existing somatic cells, but if they can attach it to a virus that is spreadable, the potential for transmission would be many times greater.

"Shedding." Funny how we're told to not misuse antibiotics to prevent resistant mutant strains, yet these people are doing this stuff. We are all test subjects...at best. At worst, we are the targets.