That just seemed worthwhile to ponder, to me. I mean no offense by posting. Just my idle mind at work.
The eclipses are based on mathematical calculations bases on long-standing measurements. The climate change stuff is based on records of just a few years (since satellite data was available), at least as far as anthropogenic climate change goes. As @Joe Riley cited above, how do they blame the Medieval Warm Period or the melting of the previous melting episodes on humans when they were not around. There was also a Roman Warm Period. It seems that when the climate warms, humans flourish but they do not cause the warming. It is possible that human activity contributes a very small amount to the global warming phenomenon, but we do not cause it as it climate fluctuations have occurred as long as the Earth has existed. The Beringian Museum in Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada once had a display to show how the Earth has been warming for over 15,000 years--since the end of the last Ice Age--but I doubt that exhibit still is there since it doesn't agree with the current agenda. Many of the "scientists" come out against the Global Warming Agenda after they retire. They support it only as long as their funding depends on their support of the warming theory. Global Climate Change narrative is simply a system to manipulate the facts to create another mechanism of control of the masses in Western Society. China and India are exempt form the treaties that have been hatched, and they are the biggest polluters on the planet. That should tell you something.
Man is making a mess of the planet, period. I want to breath fresh air and be able to see the stars at night. I don't want to be surrounded by garbage. Climate change is a separate issue.
Yeah, but CO2 is now a pollutant. China and India both use coal plants for electricity in addition to the crap they throw into the oceans.