I forgot about that
@Don Alaska . My Ophthalmologist did my cataract surgery with the knife. He likes using the knife and feels it has less recovery time, but it was my choice. I “think” he said using the laser does take longer to heal, and it may cause a little more tissue damage, plus some Medicare insurance plans will not pay for laser when only having just cataracts removed with no special lens. The laser is computerized, whereas the knife is skill. I can’t remember all the details because there was so much information to absorb. I liked my Ophthalmologist. He took his time explaining every type of lens, procedure, cost, recovery, etc. He gave me lots of information to look at and take home so I didn’t have to make a decision right then. He never tried to talk me into or out of any type of lens. I took my husband along so he good listen and ask questions as well. Plus, my eyes were dilated and I needed a driver. I gave great consideration to the multifocal lens but the halo effect had me concerned, since I already have one floater that is permanently affixed to my retina, or the fluid between the retina and eye. I didn’t want to take a chance of having anything else unusual going on in my eye.
On my 2rd visit back to the Ophthalmologist, I polled the people sitting in the waiting room. One person in the waiting room had the multifocal lens. He said he did have halos but he didn’t want to wear glasses. It was a trade-off to him. He was in his 80’s. A couple had the toric lens and was very happy with it. But most of the older patients that were there for their post-surgery check-up didn’t get a Toric lens to correct any visual problems, such as astigmatism. They just had their cateracts removed; what Medicare would pay for.
I am all over the place here with my memory recall. I hope it makes sense.