I was again listening to the radio this morning and on the "Crazy Train" segment they talked about an anatomy practice test that the dad of a Jacksonville, Florida high school girl was made aware of. I think I can remember the details because they're pretty hard to forget: "Ursula was devastated when her boyfriend broke up with her after having sex. In retaliation, the next day she had sex with his best friend. Nine months later she gave birth to a beautiful baby girl. Ursula has type 0+ blood, her boyfriend has B+ and his friend has AB- blood. What types of blood does Ursula's baby girl NOT have? " Call me a prude if you will, but what the heck kind of test is this? I realize that the example demanded a multiple partner equation in order to amp up the possibilities but is the question not bridging into the arena of morality or human sexual ethics?
The only type that appears to be absolutely eliminated would be AB. If there is a possibility of either father, the Rh can't definitely be determined. I agree, the moral basis is absurd and leads impressionable young folks down a wrong path.
They are teaching it is OK to be unfaithful. The education system has been taken over by a mental illness
It's just another part of teaching sex education and immorality to our kids and grandkids to me. They are integrating these teachings into every subject so as to "brain wash" future adults into believing nothing is wrong to do or think.