Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'In the News' started by Martin Alonzo, Aug 14, 2016.
Wikileaks has exposed journalists in Hillary's camp.
The dumb down average American can only look at the MSM and will never see Wikileaks and learn the truth. It is obvious that not one person has came forward and said that these are not true. MSM will not show them because it shows them being in the bag for Hillary
The media has always been biased but this election period they have taken it to new levels. It is as if the only thing that matters to the media right now is to elect Hillary Clinton. They don't care if they have any credibility anymore; they'll worry about that after the election. If there are threats of legal action, that's okay, as they'll deal with that after the election too. Promoting Hillary seems to be the only goal they have right now, and to do that they will lie, they will manipulate photos and video, and they will hide information from the public.
CNN, reporting on Trump's call for both candidates to be drug tested before the next debate, referred to Trump's claims as "wild claims," and twice commented that he offered no proof for his allegations.
This was a news article, not a commentary. Every media outlet published, broadcast, and has been doing nothing but repeating claims that Trump has made sexual advances toward a string of women during his lifetime, and I have yet to read or hear a news report mention that these claims have been made without any proof or evidence. No, instead, they have steadfastly ignored evidence showing that these claims were false. Nor have they referred to any of these allegations as "wild claims," or questioned them in any way. Rather, the narrative that they would have the public believe is that the large number of these allegations is proof enough. I haven't even heard a media outlet question why these women are suddenly remembering these things thirty years later, and weeks before a national election, or why there were no police reports or witnesses.
Whenever Trump says anything negative about Hillary, it is described as an attack, a rant, a tweet storm, or some other such thing; yet when Hillary or her surrogates do the same, it is treated as news or as information. It is not questioned, nor are any judgements made about her attacks on Trump.
It is as if the media's only purpose right now is to elect Hillary in November. Everything else is on hold.
This BS about all these women who claim that he attacked them is just a crock. If you offer a lot of money to someone who might have come in contact with Trump in the past. The Clinton camp has offered money for anything that can be used against Trump. You will get a line up across the US after offering money who knows which story is true. This is a tactic used by the Clintons as far back as when he was running for Governor.
Anyone who runs against a Democrat in a presidential election is accused of being a racist, a sexist, or a rapist.
Last thing I saw, this evening, a woman claims Trump "forcibly kissed her"!
Anything of that sort can be stopped very quickly, nipped in the bud, as it were, by a swiftly raised knee......
Guess this woman never thought of that!
Here's a note that I published on Facebook on that subject: Is it News or is it a Conspiracy?
CNN wants you to believe that it is illegal for you to read Wikileaks.
@Ken Anderson Good job, I LIKE it!
After the next and last Trump-Clinton debate, there will be another anti-Trump video or audio released, this one concentrating on his racism. Bear in mind, that Trump is not a perfect candidate. He has not groomed himself for the job over the course of his entire life so, like most of us, he has said or done things that can prove to be embarrassing. Unlike most of us, much of his life has been near a camera or microphone.
However, when you compare what he has done or said to the serious crimes that have been committed by Hillary Clinton, and the Clinton campaign, he's an angel. The problem is that the media will not make the comparison. Rather than looking into or even reporting on the evidence against Hillary Clinton, they will spend the rest of the time, between now and the election, hyping Trump's faults.
So after Trump thrashes Hillary in the next debate, the media will be talking about Trump's racism rather than about any issues relevant to the election.
The very fact that the media might have something relevant, and chooses to hold it until after the debate should demonstrate that they are not reporting the news, but acting in collusion with the Hillary campaign.
Yet another example. Politico allowed the Hillary campaign to edit a story before publication.
I'm at the point where I can't take anymore of this crap from the left and the media. Ive had it, it's endless and so ridiculous.
I would be embarrassed to call myself MSM and do the stories they do.
I don't see one thing about Hillary but today I find out that someone that worked on the apprentice said that Gary Busey assaulted her and Trump laughed. It just gets crazier and crazier.
I think they will bring out something just before the next debate to give them a new talking point so he is defending himself again instead off talking about what he should be.
Yep, he should just ignore it and talk about the issues...refuse to stoop to their level.
Someone from ABC said this morning that they (meaning the media, not necessarily ABC) have a video or audio of Trump saying something racist, and that will be aired sometime after the next debate, so that Trump's racism will become the issue rather than his performance in the debate, or any of the issues. The entire campaign has been orchestrated between the media and the Hillary campaign.
His sex talk tape was planned to be released after the last debate if he did well. The only reason that it was aired before the debate was that someone leaked it early, which probably helped Trump rather than having it aired after the debate.
Somebody's gonna get fired.
Problem is that only the people voting Trump will listen or even believe any of this. Anything negative about Hillary goes in one ear and out the other with her supporters...she has media on her side and a lot of the top Republicans in the party....and if I believed in the devil I would have added his name too.
John F. Kennedy on Wikileaks & Julian Assange