Italy -- Vaccines

Discussion in 'Not Sure Where it Goes' started by Martin Alonzo, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:27 AM.

  1. Martin Alonzo

    Martin Alonzo Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2015
    Messages:
    3,368
    Likes Received:
    3,250
    I don’t know it this belongs in news or health but not conspiracy

    This is covered very little in the main street news and what they are saying is completely negative.
    Italy has gone anti vaccine and fired people in that part of government. What do they know that the rest of the world would like to know? There is so much pressure from WHO, CDC, and even Bill Gates to vaccinate everyone on earth. The WHO would say Italy is pushing everyone back to the Stone Age. If they know something important will it ever find its way to main street media when the media is controlled with the people complaining at what they are doing?

    Will we ever learn the truth?

    https://duckduckgo.com/?t=palemoon&q=Italy+anti+vaccine+&ia=web
     
    #1
    Bobby Cole likes this.
  2. Bobby Cole

    Bobby Cole Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,854
    Likes Received:
    5,191
    From what I have read, Italy isn’t going anti-vaccine but anti-aluminum, mercury and Thimerosol which are used as suspensions and preservatives for the vaccine.
    Both aluminum and mercury are neurotoxins and are supposed to be in such microscopic amounts that unless a child is specifically genetically susceptible to the affects of them then it’s said that they should do no harm.

    From my point of view, having those ingredients in any amount should be a warning sign that the vaccines in their entirety shouldn’t be used.
    It’s a given that most major diseases have no actual cure but are beaten by the prevention programs that are set in place but when the prevention might be as bad as the disease, then it’s time to rethink the program.
     
    #2
    Martin Alonzo likes this.
  3. Don Alaska

    Don Alaska Very Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2018
    Messages:
    1,762
    Likes Received:
    2,647
    Most vaccines were "lawsuit proof" by the U.S. Congress here in (I think 1987) because the risks are high enough that no one would produce them if there were the threat of being sued for side effects. Even so, most of the vaccines given here are manufactured outside the U.S. to further isolate the makers from legal consequences. That is also why you see MANY commercials for lawyers looking to sue the drug companies, but not one surrounding vaccine side effects. As a result, vaccines have much lower approval standards under the FDA regulations. A typical example is the Flu vaccine. That is made differently every year and, since a flu vaccine was approved in the 1970s, it is now released with no trials whatsoever. Most years the manufacturers have no idea if the vaccines work or cover the virus strains that are endangering folks. There is a vaccine under development that will be a universal vaccine. If that is developed, it will probably have to undergo trials and approval prior to release.
     
    #3
    Bobby Cole and Martin Alonzo like this.
  4. Chrissy Cross

    Chrissy Cross Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2015
    Messages:
    18,489
    Likes Received:
    17,502
    I have never had any problems or negative effects from any vaccines and neither has anybody Ive ever known, so I'm okay with them and think they're important but I'm not forcing anyone to get one but I believed in them in protecting my children at the time....and still do.

    I recently got my flu shot and will probably get my first dose of the new shingles shot maybe this month.
     
    #4
    Bobby Cole likes this.

Share This Page