House Gop Plan Would Cut Medicare, Social Security To Balance Budget

Discussion in 'In the News' started by Ken Anderson, Jun 22, 2018.

  1. Ken Anderson

    Ken Anderson Greeter
    Moderator Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    11,306
    Likes Received:
    15,864
    Do you remember how Democrats are always saying that Republicans are going to cut Medicare and Social Security? Well, in past years these have been lies.

    This time, I am not so sure it's a lie. House Republicans released a budget proposal that would balance in nine years, but do so by making large cuts to Medicare and Social Security.

    Here's the part that infuriates me. In every story that I read about it, they refer to Medicare and Social Security as entitlement programs.

    Although we have paid into these programs our entire working lives, they are referring to them as entitlement programs.

    Medicaid is an entitlement program. Giving a free ride to illegal immigrants is an entitlement program. The healthcare program that our congress has given themselves and their families is an entitlement program.

    To me, this seems to be a sure way for the Republicans to lose their majority.

    As it is since I have been on Social Security, every raise that we have gotten has met by a simultaneous rise in my Medicare premium.

    I could understand the argument that these are expensive programs and that those of us who collect on them are likely to collect more than we've paid in, but we have paid into these programs, against our will, throughout our working lives.

    It also concerns me that we are supposed to believe that Medicare and Social Security costs are breaking our budget, yet many of these same Republicans (and every Democrat) are eager to bring illegal immigrants in here, at a huge expense that will never end. Too many of them, in both parties, seem to enjoy waging senseless wars, and every one of them is paid far, far more than he or she is worth.

    -- Chicago Tribune
     
    #1
    Michelle Anderson and Don Alaska like this.
  2. Ken Anderson

    Ken Anderson Greeter
    Moderator Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    11,306
    Likes Received:
    15,864
    I don't know that these budget proposals will pass, and I suspect that they will not, but I can't imagine why the Republicans would sacrifice the midterms. I also don't know just which of them is involved in this, other than Paul Ryan and Marco Rubio.
     
    #2
    Michelle Anderson likes this.
  3. Frank Sanoica

    Frank Sanoica Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2016
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    5,858
    @Ken Anderson
    This is all bullshit propagated by a government which has bloated itself beyond saving. The S/S dictum had absolutely no provisions for the ridiculous benefits being doled out. It predicated on retirement benefits ONLY. It stipulated anonymity. Try to go anywhere today without giving your S/S #.

    The politicians have raped the original concept of S/S to the point of rupture.

    Despite Presidential power, Trump will not be able to remedy much of this, I think. The future holds......God knows what. Frank
     
    #3
    Michelle Anderson and Don Alaska like this.
  4. Ken Anderson

    Ken Anderson Greeter
    Moderator Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    11,306
    Likes Received:
    15,864
    As long as we are wasting billions upon billions of dollars that we don't have on things that we don't need and, in many cases, that the world would be better off without, there is no justification for it.
     
    #4
  5. Don Alaska

    Don Alaska Very Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2018
    Messages:
    2,278
    Likes Received:
    3,468
    One is a representative and one is a senator....
     
    #5
  6. Chrissy Cross

    Chrissy Cross Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2015
    Messages:
    18,934
    Likes Received:
    18,244
    Guess I'm lucky...I never paid into theses programs being a stay at home mom. It's all a nice freebie for me, so I don't complain no matter what it's called....more of an entitlement for me really.

    My husband did pay into it though and I'm using part of that....but I'm not worried about it.

    I don't know the future but I know I'll survive....my kids probably won't even need their social security
    Even though they got lots taken out...maybe someone else will use that..

    As for Medicare...who knows where health care will be in the future?

    I'm tired of all the fear mongering....I'm sure things will be different in the future but I'm not worried about mine...things don't change that quickly.

    We've had illegals here using resources as you say for a long time now....my life has not changed one iota.

    I go by what really happens in my life not by what's predicted by either side.

    And to be honest...in the 14 years Ive lived in Fresno through democrat and republican presidents...my life stays the same...which is good.
     
    #6
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2018
  7. Harry Havens

    Harry Havens Very Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    May 24, 2017
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    585
    Medicare and Social Security are indeed entitlement programs, as people that have paid taxes based on these programs are "entitled" to benefits at retirement.

    Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income, et al are welfare programs and are not classified as "entitlement" as they are paid via general revenue funding.
     
    #7
    Yvonne Smith likes this.
  8. Ken Anderson

    Ken Anderson Greeter
    Moderator Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    11,306
    Likes Received:
    15,864
    They are entitlement programs only for those who have not paid into them. Otherwise, they are no more an entitlement program than a mandatory insurance policy. After making insurance payments, you have every right to expect them to pay their part. That's not an entitlement program.
     
    #8
    Don Alaska likes this.
  9. Harry Havens

    Harry Havens Very Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    May 24, 2017
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    585
    It's a free country and you are "entitled" to be completely wrong, when you so wish.

    upload_2018-6-23_13-40-40.png

    https://www.senate.gov/reference/glossary_term/entitlement.htm

    Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income, etc. are NOT entitlement programs.
     
    #9
  10. Ken Anderson

    Ken Anderson Greeter
    Moderator Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    11,306
    Likes Received:
    15,864
    Okay, in that case, every federal employee is receiving entitlements. I get what you're saying but I doubt that the semantics are going to help Republicans maintain a majority by going after Social Security and Medicare.

    By the way, what "legal recourse" would you have if they cut your Social Security? By that definition, how is Medicaid not an entitlement? Eligible people have sued and won for being denied Medicaid benefits. In fact, right now, the State of Maine is fighting a court ruling forcing it to expand its Medicaid coverage.

    By the way, a congressional definition defining Medicare and Social Security as entitlements was the point of this thread. I am not saying they cannot define it as such. I am saying that this is not going to help them in the midterms, and I stand by that.

    Basically, I am saying that Congress referring to Social Security and Medicare as an entitlement program that they are going to cut is a bad idea for the midterms, and you are countering me be showing that Congress is referring to Social Security and Medicare as an entitlement program.

    They could define access to your bank account as an entitlement program if they wanted to, given that you are entitled to it because it's your money, but when they follow that by cutting your bank account by a large percentage, that wouldn't incline you to vote for them in November.
     
    #10
  11. Harry Havens

    Harry Havens Very Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    May 24, 2017
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    585
    Please show me this budget proposal that is making these large cuts. The article mentions the possibility of future cuts for future retirees, but there is no budget proposal saying such. The tax bill on the table would increase the deficit over ten years. The subject of entitlements such as S.S. and Medicare have often been discussed as needing to be addressed by both Rs and Ds. The Ds generally want to increase the cap and the Rs want to raise the retirement age... most often for people 55 and under and phased in. Eventually something must be done. That it is being talked about is nothing new.

    Since day one, the social insurance programs have been defined as "entitlements". Perhaps you missed the memo. Social welfare programs, such as Medicaid, SSI, etc. have not been entitlements.
     
    #11
  12. Ken Anderson

    Ken Anderson Greeter
    Moderator Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    11,306
    Likes Received:
    15,864
    I posted the news article, which is what I was referring to. I could post others, but they don't give a lot of additional information. If you believe it's wrong, take it up with the Chicago Tribune. It certainly wouldn't be the first time they were wrong.

    You're missing the point. You're not wrong, but you're not addressing the same thing that I was, but that's okay. I am talking about how this is likely to affect the chances of the Republicans in the midterms if they go into it pushing a budget that cuts Social Security and Medicare while funding welfare for illegal immigrants. Voters don't generally look at the congressional website and accept that something is okay because it says it right there.

    My point remains the same. You are pointing to the fact that the legislature has referred to Medicare and Social Security as an entitlement as if that should make it okay with everyone, the point that I am making is that, if they do indeed go into the midterms with a budget that calls for cuts in these programs, it is not going to bode well for them. They lose votes when they raise the retirement age but if they push a budget that cuts Social Security or Medicare benefits for people who are collecting it, they are going to lose a lot more, and no one is going to care what the congressional website says, particularly not in a climate where the Republican base is already upset about illegal immigration.

    People are not going to consider that it's okay that they are getting less from Social Security now, or paying for their Medicare, because, after all, it says right here on the congressional website that it's an entitlement. No, they are going to be angry that we are spending a huge amount of money on illegal immigrants, foreign wars and aid, and congressional paychecks and perks while trying to make up the difference by cutting Social Security and Medicare.

    People might be willing to make sacrifices if they are persuaded that they are necessary and if it appears that sacrifices are made elsewhere, as well. But that's not the case here. I have heard of no discussion about cutting congressional benefits.

    It might be fine with you but there are a lot of Republicans that it won't be fine with it. I only became aware of this because it is already under discussion on a Facebook Republican group, who otherwise support Republicans, although not necessarily Marco Rubio or Paul Ryan.

    Both of Maine's Republican legislators will support whatever Paul Ryan tells them to, and that is true of other Republican legislators. Historically, the Party in power loses seats in the midterms anyhow, so this is not going to be a winner for them.
     
    #12
  13. Harry Havens

    Harry Havens Very Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    May 24, 2017
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    585
    Nowhere in the article you seeded did any republicans say they would be pushing such a budget before the mid term elections. The headline is somewhat accurate, but fails to delineate a time frame for each. Welfare was front and center in the body of the article, with S.S. and Medicare being handled like this...
    A democrat said the republicans were considering it.

    This is what the republicans commented on...
    Toomey further stated...
    Then...

    Guess what Sanders, you are the one likely to cut S.S. and Medicare by promising not to do anything.

    The fact remains there must be some type of changes... at some point in time, regarding Social Security and Medicare. Welfare programs must also be corrected. The dems and socialist Sanders are trying to scare seniors by trying to lump various programs together in one basket... and it seems to be working.

    Edit: EVERY SINGLE ELECTION CYCLE, the dems try this tactic.

    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ublicans-congress-want-take-away-social-secu/

    As for the mid terms, it is a toss up as to who controls the house after the election. The senate is very likely to remain republican.
     
    #13
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2018
    Ken Anderson likes this.
  14. Ken Anderson

    Ken Anderson Greeter
    Moderator Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    11,306
    Likes Received:
    15,864
    I posted a news article here and summarized it; I didn't write it. You have made some good points. Although I don't find the Chicago Tribune article to be over the top, there are political attacks against Rubio by Democrats that are highly exaggerated, but that should be no surprise. I didn't include them, though.

    Rubio has frequently advocated for raising the retirement age and has often spoken in favor of Ryan's plans for cuts in Social Security and Medicare. None of this is new on his part. My concern is in making it an issue going into the midterms, and the suggestion in the news articles that these are being proposed in a Republican budget.

    The time to get upset about something is not when it's too late to do anything about it, and you might have noticed that, although it's been ages since the Congress has actually passed a budget, Omnibus bills include a whole lot of stuff that is not revealed until it's too late, passed overnight, without anyone having read it. If it turns out that people are being upset about something that doesn't come about, we'll never know whether it was never intended to begin with or whether it wasn't advanced because people were upset about it.

    In 2016, while running for president, Rubio backed off of cuts to the program, suggesting, instead, a series of raises in the retirement age, also part of Ryan's plan. While running for reelection, he also brings on the gentler approach.

    Last fall, Rubio was in favor of making cuts to Social Security, so the attacks don't seem to be out of character for either Rubio or Ryan. Given that Rubio's positions are usually relaxed during election years, it's hard to pin him down on any one position.

    One thing is clear, however. While he can be depended upon to vote against controlling our borders, and in favor of bringing more dependent people into the country, he views cuts in Social Security and Medicare as being central to his economic plans for the country, and this is going to be a problem.

    You can't scare people into accepting cuts to their benefits or a lower standard of living when these cuts are coming from people who are surely not willing to lowe their own standard of living or that of their families, and who are willing to take on other huge expenses, such as illegal immigration, that are not viewed as being in the country's best interests.
     
    #14
    Harry Havens likes this.
  15. Harry Havens

    Harry Havens Very Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    May 24, 2017
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    585
    Inaction will do that as well. For example the Medicare trust fund.
    In 2017, $705B was shelled out for all of Medicare. Medicare part A will be insolvent in 2026, meaning the revenue will only meet 91% of estimated expenses which were $299.4B in 2017. A 9% cut in services is virtually guaranteed, unless Congress were to take that 9% from the general revenue fund. Part A expenses for 2027 are expected to be $535B. Congress would have to make up $48B each year with the figure likely rising each year. How likely is it that congress will allocate that funding, especially given the projected size of the federal debt by that time, which is well above 125%, which is only the marketable debt and does not include non marketable debt.

    Salvaging the Medicare part A is possible, but S.S. is likely to tip everything in 2034. There, a gap of 25% will need to be made up from general revenue. That amount is somewhere in the $300B~$400B range annually. I cannot see congress allocating that amount of money. The full faith and credit thing will likely be a joke by then.

    Whether congress does anything or does nothing... cuts are going to happen.
     
    #15
    Ken Anderson likes this.

Share This Page