Exactly Bobby! That was the point my father proved with his over 1000 pages of fine printed formulas showing every possibility based on the theorem as Fermat supposed it. I brought it up as an example of why the double slit experiment once baffled scientists and still baffles laymen if they base their thinking on what was supposed back in the early 1900s. The computerized double slit experiments we see on YouTube are programmed to get the result the creator wanted. Why can't the double slit be recreated just as Young claims he did it? I am waiting for that documented unaltered video. To clarify, Young's experiment in no way proved his supposition that human conscientiousness can exist outside the human brain and control particles. The basics to understand before discussing such a topic are: What are particles? What is an electron? What is light? What is wave? So-called quantum physics wants us to believe that an electron is a wave, not just a particle even though it has particle-like manifestations. They suppose a wave-particle duality. Their basis for such a claim is a reference to the double-slit experiment. Electron: a stable subatomic particle with a charge of negative electricity, found in all atoms and acting as the primary carrier of electricity in solids. One only needs to read the Bible to know that light is just the absence of darkness. Is light a particle as quantum physics supposes? Does that particle disappear in the darkness.? We know light as a wave and it is measured by the distance it travels in a year. So what is the definition of quantum as it applies to physics? A discrete quantity of energy proportional in magnitude to the frequency of the radiation it represents. That definition alone proves that wave-particle duality is pure nonsense! It has been disproven many times over, yet liberal professors still teach it as fact. Why? My opinion is because it fits in with the new liberal agenda of teaching our youth what to think, rather than how to think.